Legal Opinion
In re Hensel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default (see Matter of Wedlock, 230 AD2d 422 [1997]; see also Matter of Frank, 9 AD3d 916 [2004]; Matter of Cary, 7 AD3d 24 [2004]; Matter of Gaesser, 6 AD3d 1246 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Smith, JJ.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re CaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re WedlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re TerminiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006