Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Knowlton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The appellant, as assignee of Scobey and Donnell, sued Ephraim Knowlton before a justice of the peace, upon two promissory notes, which were executed for and in consideration of the right to use and vend, in Addison township, in Shelby county, Indiana, Hunt’s patented machine for separating sugar from sorghum molasses.

The maker of the notes died, during the pendency of the action, and the appellees, his administrators, were substituted as defendants.

There have been three trials of the cause. The trial before the justice resulted in a verdict for appellees.

The appellant appealed to the circuit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Patten v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Shaw v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Joest v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Love v. OldhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. DeFord v. UrbainIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Citizens' Street Railroad v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Regensburg v. NotestineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Monnier v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API