Legal Opinion

Littledale v. Brush

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1941No. 6 Div. 767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The bill seeks a sale of the 160 acres of land therein described for division among tenants in common, and from a final decree awarding relief sought defendants prosecute this appeal.

The land originally was owned by the three sisters, parties defendants to this bill; Mrs. Littledale owning an undivided five-seventh interest, Mrs. Elliott and Mrs. Thompson owning a one-seventh interest each.

Mrs. Elliott, prior to the institution of this suit, for a recited consideration of $400 conveyed to complainant, N. A. Brush, an undivided one-seventh interest in and to the timber…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shepard v. Mount Vernon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Harrell v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Henry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Howard v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Bluefield Timber, L.L.C. v. Harlan Lee Land, L.L.C., Circuit Court of the 20th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lee County2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API