Legal Opinion
Smith Scow Corp. v. Seaboard Great Lakes Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 9, 1945No. Nos. 182, 183PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
On July 25, 1943, while the scow Margaret McCabe was alongside the motorship Emma Bakke, in a berth on the south side of Pier 6 Brooklyn, N. Y., loaded with sand ballast from the motor ship, the sand on her split and caused her. to careen against the side of the ship and capsize. Both vessels were damaged.
Smith Scow Corporation, the owner of the scow, sued Seaboard Great Lakes Corporation, to be called Seaboard, to whom it had chartered the scow. Seaboard answered and impleaded Maritime Terminal Company, Inc., to be called Maritime, Oi-vind Lorentzen, as Director of Shipping and Curator of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dailey v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- The Cullen No. 32Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guerrini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Crain Brothers, Inc., a Corporation, Etc., Libellant v. Wieman and Ward Company, a Corporation, (Union Barge Line Corporation, a Corporation, Third Party Respondent). Wieman and Ward Company, a Corporation, Libellant v. Union Barge Line Corporation, a Corporation, (Crain Brothers, Inc., a Corporation, Third Party Appellant). Crain Brothers, Inc., Libellant v. Wieman and Ward Company, (Union Barge Line Corporation, Third Party Appellant). Wieman and Ward Company, Libellant v. Union Barge Line Corporation, (Crain Brothers, Inc., Third Party Respondent)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Crain Bros. v. Wieman & Ward Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- King v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947