Manley Bennett, McDonald & Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Before me are St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company’s (St. Paul) motion for summary judgment and motion to add third-party defendants, and Manley Bennett, McDonald & Co.’s (MBM) motion for summary judgment. The issues are: (1) whether St. Paul is obligated to indemnify MBM (a stock-brokerage firm) for the legal fees and expenses it incurred in defending itself against two lawsuits under the terms of two surety bonds requiring indemnification for such costs due to the dishonest or fraudulent acts' of MBM partners or employees (these “defense costs”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Shepard Marine Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dochod v. Central Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DTM Research, L.L.C. v. AT & T Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Manley, Bennett, McDonald & Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992