State v. Curtis Cline
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
¶1 The State of Montana (State) charged Curtis Cline (Cline) with theft by common scheme, in violation of §45-6-301(a), MCA. Cline filed a motion to dismiss the charge. Cline argued that the charge violated his right not to be subject to double jeopardy under §46-11-504, MCA. The District Court denied Cline’s motion to dismiss. Cline appeals. We affirm.
¶2 Cline presents the following issue on appeal:
¶3 Whether the theft by common scheme charge subjected Cline to double jeopardy ?
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶4 Cline stole numerous firearms and other merchandise from his employer, Bob Ward…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ArchambaultMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GazdaMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CechMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SwordMontana Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EllerbeeMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. J. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. D. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. F. TorresMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Curtis ClineMontana Supreme Court · 2013