Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis Cline

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2013No. DA 12-0492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 The State of Montana (State) charged Curtis Cline (Cline) with theft by common scheme, in violation of §45-6-301(a), MCA. Cline filed a motion to dismiss the charge. Cline argued that the charge violated his right not to be subject to double jeopardy under §46-11-504, MCA. The District Court denied Cline’s motion to dismiss. Cline appeals. We affirm.

¶2 Cline presents the following issue on appeal:

¶3 Whether the theft by common scheme charge subjected Cline to double jeopardy ?

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶4 Cline stole numerous firearms and other merchandise from his employer, Bob Ward…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ArchambaultMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. GazdaMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. CechMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SwordMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EllerbeeMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. J. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. D. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. F. TorresMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Curtis ClineMontana Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API