Legal Opinion
Dry Hand Mop Co. v. Squeez-Ezy Mop Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1927No. 4893PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
This was a bill in equity for the alleged infringement of two patents, issued to plaintiff’s assignor, Kenner, and which the defendant (appellee in this court) is charged with having infringed. The defendant conceded the validity of both of the plaintiff’s patents, but denies the infringement of either. The District Court sustained the patents, but held that the defendant’s mop did not infringe plaintiff’s patents, and dismissed the bill for that reason, and plaintiff appeals from the decree of dismissal.. The question of infringement requires separate treatment as to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Roemer v. PeddieSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Burns v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Karl Ziegler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Southern States Equipment Corp. v. Usco Power Equipment Corp. Usco Power Equipment Corp. v. Southern States Equipment CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Hughes v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- McKays Co. v. Penn Electric Switch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.