Legal Opinion

Matagorda County Appraisal District v. Coastal Liquids Partners

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2005No. 03-1200PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

We must decide whether salt dome caverns created to store liquid hydrocarbons may be appraised and taxed separately from the surface land above them. The question has been here before, but we did not reach it in Coastal Liquids Transportation, L.P. v. Harris County Appraisal District because the taxpayer lacked capacity. 1 Predictably, given the millions of tax dollars involved, 2 the question has surfaced again.

In this case, the taxpayer Coastal Liquids Partners, L.P. challenged the Mata- gorda County Appraisal District’s valuation of the Hiltpold # 1 and Hudson # 3 caverns at almost $2…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Coastal Liquids Transportation, L.P. v. Harris County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. Federal Land Bank of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Electra Independent School Dist. v. W. T. Waggoner EstateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Cameron Appraisal District v. RourkTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. and Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. v. Commission on State Emergency CommunicationsTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. MHCB (USA) Leasing & Finance Corp. v. Galveston Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Brennan v. City of Willow ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Bosque Disposal Sys., LLC v. Parker Cnty. Appraisal Dist.Texas Supreme Court · 2018

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API