Legal Opinion

Kupsik v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1962No. 36958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The circuit court of Cook County held the zoning ordinance of the city of Chicago invalid as it applied to a lot owned by the plaintiffs, Joseph Kupsik and Stella Kupsik, his wife. The trial judge certified that the public interest required a direct appeal to this court, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap, no, par. 75,) and-the city has appealed.

The first issue that confronts us is a procedural one. The city contends that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to hear the case. It bases that contention upon paragraph (e) of section 73 — 4 of the Revised Cities and Villages Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Harmon v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Merrill v. City of WheatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lazarus v. Village of NorthbrookIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kaske v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mid-Town Petroleum, Inc. v. DineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Cosmopolitan National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Gagne v. Village of LaGrangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API