Legal Opinion

Hillock v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1946No. 31257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

We have set forth the evidence somewhat at length in order that it may speak for itself, and also that we may more intelligently analyze it. Counsel for the defendant lays .great stress upon the fact that Powell, the one who was alleged to have been robbed, stated in effect that all he knew about the identity of the persons who robbed him was what Gaskins, the codefendant, told him after the robbery. We have examined carefully the testimony of Powell, and find that throughout his testimony he' stated that he did not know the person who took the money from his person, while the codefendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Caswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Kilgore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Futch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API