Legal Opinion

Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Hart

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1889Published

Appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

—The plaintiff, as the owner of office furniture, machinery, tools, wares and merchandise, brought this ¿action to restrain their sale and disposition under an execution issued to the defendant Hart, as sheriff of the county -of Albany.

It is alleged in the complaint that the sheriff, on or about the 2d of November, 1888, levied upon this property at the •office and shops in the city of Albany of the defendant, the United States Store Service Company. A demand was made, within the time prescribed by the statute, for the •change of the place of trial to the county of Albany. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Acker v. . LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Hogg v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Cary v. Western Union Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Leland v. HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API