Sides v. State

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing

DICE, Judge.

Appellant insists that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction because it fails to show he had knowledge that the check in question was forged, which is an essential element of the offense of passing a forged instrument.'

■ The facts as set out in our original opinion' show that the *460check in question was delivered to appellant by the bank president, J. E. Hill, with instructions that he obtain Mrs. William’s signature thereon, and that some hour and a half later appellant appeared at the bank with the check purportedly signed by…