Legal Opinion

Doe v. Eggleston

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, McGlennon, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 8.

For reversal — White, Van Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 3.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  2. Stewart v. BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Winter v. ToldtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954