Legal Opinion
Doe v. Eggleston
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 20, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, McGlennon, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 8.
For reversal — White, Van Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 3.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- Stewart v. BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Winter v. ToldtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954