Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Ramada Texas, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1980No. B-8932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

After an audit, the Comptroller assessed extra 1974 franchise taxes, plus penalties and interest, against Ramada Texas, Inc. Ramada paid under protest and brought this action to recover the disputed amounts. The trial court granted judgment for Ramada, and the court of civil appeals affirmed. 588 S.W.2d 400. We reverse the judgments of the courts below and render judgment that Ramada take nothing because the $21,811.83 in franchise taxes, penalties, and interest for 1974, which Ramada paid under protest, were properly due and payable to the Comptroller.

The question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank of Paris, Ill. v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. General Dynamics Corp. v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bullock v. Ramada Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rylander v. Fisher Controls International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  2. Bullock v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bullock v. Bingo King Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Spencer Gifts, Inc. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Carole Keeton Rylander, Successor-In-Interest to John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And John Cornyn, Successor-In-Interest to Dan Morales, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. Fisher Controls International, Incorporated, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API