Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brooks v. New York State Thruway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1979No. Claim No. 59820; Claim No. 59821Published

1DissentMikoll, J.

Mikoll, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. Viewing the record in its entirety, there was sufficient evidence to establish that the hole created an unsafe condition and was a proximate cause of the accident. Based upon the observations of the driver of the following vehicle, the circumstantial evidence and the testimony of claimants’ expert witness, the findings of the court are supported by the weight of the evidence and should not be disturbed by this court (Amend v Hurley, 293 NY 587, 594; Shipman v Words of Power Missionary Enterprises, 54 AD2d 1052, 1053). In a death case, "claimant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Shipman v. Words of Power Missionary Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Brown v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API