Legal Opinion

Gring v. Lake Drummond Canal & Water Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 10, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCabdwell, J.

The plaintiff, Charles Gring, at the second rules held in the clerk’s office of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county on the 3d Monday in December, 1906, brought his action of assumpsit against the defendant, the Lake Drummond Canal and Water Company, to recover certain tolls and charges, amounting to $2,058.15, which it, as alleged, had illegally and against his protest during several years next preceding collected from the plaintiff.

The declaration contains the common counts in assumpsit, and to it an affidavit was appended, in accordance with section 3286 of the Code, and also an account…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Battaile v. Maryland Hospital for the InsaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  2. Marstiller v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Johnson v. BarhamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  4. Enders' ex'ors v. BurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859
  5. State ex rel. Kloak Bros. & Co. v. CorvinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. GraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  2. Gehl v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  3. Wilson v. ShraderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API