Legal Opinion

In re Wagner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1933No. 3126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of "the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner, rejecting, for want of invention over the prior1 art, claims 18, 19, 21, and 22 of appellant’s application for patent; claims 3 to 11, inclusive, 17, 20, 23, and 24 were allowed by the examiner. Claim 18 is illustrative of the claims on appeal and reads as follows:

18. In blowpipe apparatus, the combination of blowpipe supporting means, mechanism for effecting relative movement of said supporting means and the *986work operated upon, and blowpipe means mounted on said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re AslanianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. General Electric Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  3. Plasmart, Inc. v. Kappos.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API