Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Monaghan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 31, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position with a tax consulting agency after she failed to receive a promotion. She applied for and was initially found eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits. The employer objected and requested a hearing. Due to the employer’s inability to proceed with the hearing, however, the Administrative Law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MicaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of AlbaneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of GambinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of GerardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Matter of Page (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. In re the Claim of PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API