Legal Opinion

Munoz v. 147 Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered January 7, 2003, which denied the motion of defendants 147 Corp., United Capital Corp. and Attilio F. Petrocelli to vacate plaintiffs’ note of issue, strike the answer of third-party defendant City of New York, and compel the City to produce a particular witness and respond to defendants’ supplemental demand for discovery and inspection, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to (i) vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness and strike this action from the trial calendar,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Ortiz v. AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenberg & Estis, P.C. v. BergosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Sereda v. Sounds of Cuba, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Hoffman v. Biltmore 47 Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API