Legal Opinion · Dissent

Simpson v. General Exchange Ins. Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1930No. 12849Published

1Dissent

Mr. -Justice Cothran

(dissenting) : I think that a very different question is presented in this case from what was decided in the case of Simpson v. Insurance Co., 145 S. C., 405, 143 S. E., 184. It was there held that the act of one who hires an automobile under what has come to be the familiar “U-Drive-It” system for a limited time, under the obligation to return it, and who absconds with it and causes a total loss to the hirer, comes within the provision of a policy insuring the owner from loss by “theft, robbery, or pilferage”; that it amounted to a breach of trust with fraudulent intent,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re ShoesmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  2. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Gill v. Manhattan Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Boyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Collins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API