Legal Opinion
Miller v. Watson
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 23, 2023No. 3:18-cv-00562Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON TYLER MILLER, Case No. 3:18-cv-00562-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. STEVE WATSON, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Tyler Miller (“Miller”) filed this action against Defendant Steve Watson (“Watson”), asserting a whistleblower retaliation claim in violation of Oregon law. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Miller’s state law claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), and all parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is Miller’s motion for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.