Crandall v. Beach
New York Supreme Court
Motion on the part of the defendant Beach, for a new trial on exceptions. The cause was tried before Mr. Justice Harris, at the Monroe circuit, in April last. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
T. R. Strong, Justice.
This action was brought upon an alleged partnership liability of the defendants to the plaintiff, for services rendered and property sold and delivered. The defendant Beach alone answered, and he denied the several allegations in the complaint. In opening the cause at the trial, the counsel for the plaintiff stated that the work was done for a mercantile firm doing business under the name of William Beach & Co., of which the defendant Beach was a member; that he did not expect to show that John Doe was a partner in the.firm, or who the other partner was; and that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robertson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Van Eps v. DillayeNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Whitney & Bancroft v. Sterling & HunterNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Halliday v. McDougallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Eddy v. O'HaraNew York Supreme Court · 1835
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gardner v. KraftNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
- McGill v. Weil, New York County Courts1890
- Fischer v. HetheringtonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Fischer v. HetheringtonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1895
- Perkins v. Richmond, New York County Courts1858