People v. Carleo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1068In a proceeding to determine a defendant’s designation under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the “burden of proving the facts supporting the determinations sought by clear and convincing evidence” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Bright, 63 AD3d 1133 [2009] ; People v Atkinson, 65 AD3d 1112 [2009]; People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404, 406 [2005]; SORA: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 5, ¶ 7 [2006]). The People may satisfy their burden of proof through the submission…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. InghilleriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HewittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. UrregoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. MingoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.