Legal Opinion · Dissent

Willard J. Luff v. Ruth K. Luff

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 24, 1966No. 19311Published

1DissentLeventhal, Circuit Judge

I cannot follow the path taken by my brethren. The point of departure for all of us becomes for me the point of return —the word of the testator executed in full accordance with the statute, witnessed by two adult witnesses. No word written down by ordinary man is more solemn than his last will and testament. The governing legislation not only pro*240vided the requirements for the writing to be effective as a testament, but carefully provided that one who wished to revoke his will might do so by written document or destruction of the prior will. 19 D.C.Code § 103 (1961 ed.). Even the untutored…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pascucci v. AlsopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Morris F. Luff v. Willard J. Luff and John W. Slacks, Willard J. Luff and John W. Slacks v. Morris F. LuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  3. Caswell v. KentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  4. Allen v. HeronCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API