Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Newnham

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of Error,to tlie Circuit Court for Suwannee .«ounty. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of ihe court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, J.:

On November 23rd, 1893, judgment was rendered against plaintiffs in error in a certain suit wherein they were claimants, and the defendant in error was plaintiff in a certain execution levied upon personal property, the subject-matter of the claim suit. On the 24th of March, 1894, plaintiffs in error sued out a writ of error from this judgment, returnable to the present June term of this court, and at the same time a scire facias act audiendum errores was issued by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Suwannee county, in which office the writ of error was issued. Defendent in error, on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dayton v. LashSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Buddington, Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1887
  3. Oppenheimer v. GuckenheimerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  4. Williams v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  5. Joost v. ElliottSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller, as Admrx. Etc. v. BurrussSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Pyles v. BeallSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Pyles v. BeallSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  4. Weston v. BonneySupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  5. Gerig v. Diamond Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API