Legal Opinion

Fife v. Beck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1956No. 34310Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

On this appeal complainant advances three errors which he claims are prejudicial to him:

1. Refusal of the trial court to permit the complainant to cross-examine the respondents.

2. Failure to place the burden on the respondents of proving the claimed inter vivos gift by clear and convincing evidence.

3. Refusal of the trial court to admit in evidence decedent’s personal property tax returns filed by him with the county auditor in the years subsequent to the claimed gifts to Mildred A. Beck.

Section 2109.50, Revised Code, reads in part as follows:

“Upon complaint made to the Probate Court or to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Keshner v. KeshnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. In re the Estate of CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Goodrich, Admr. v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API