Legal Opinion
Tyler v. County of Alameda
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1995No. A066161PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOSSEE, J.
In this lawsuit, plaintiff challenges the new statutory procedure for contesting parking tickets. Two issues are presented: (1) May the contestant constitutionally be required to pay the parking penalty before an administrative hearing is held? (2) May the contestant lawfully be required to pay a fee of $25 to defray the costs of administrative review?
Legal Background
In 1992 the Legislature substantially changed the way parking violations are handled. No longer are parking violations treated as infractions within the criminal justice system; instead, they are treated as civil…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Azim ChoudhryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fleishman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Love v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.