Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Adena Health System
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2002No. Case No. 02CA2652PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kline, Judge.
{¶ 1} Phillip Prior, M.D. appeals from the Ross County Common Pleas Court’s discovery order, which compelled him to produce (1) the names of any drugs to which he was addicted from 1991 through 1999 and (2) the name of any person, company, or institution that rendered treatment to him for drug or alcohol use, abuse, or addiction from 1991 through 1999. He asserts that this information is statutorily privileged under R.C. 2317.02 and R.C. 3793.13. We disagree because the information requested is not a “communication” that is protected under R.C. 2317.02, and because he waived his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Lightbody v. RustOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HoopOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Care Risk Retention Group v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ward v. Summa Health SystemOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Turk v. OilerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Cachat v. IQS, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dubson v. Montefiore HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.