Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Bankers Trust Co.

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 26, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

The petitioning corporation is the sole surviving executor of the last will of the decedent, and in addition to asking for a judicial settlement of its accounts, it requests a construction of paragraphs “ second ” and “ third ” of the decedent’s will. Three answers containing objections have been filed; one on behalf of a daughter of the decedent, a residuary legatee, and the others by special guardians for two groups of interested infant parties. The paragraphs of the will as to which construction is desired, so far as material to the question involved, provide as follows:

“Second.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Thompson v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  4. Hobart v. . HobartNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. In Re the Final Accounting of FrazerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  2. Richards v. MidkiffHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Estate of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of GerbereuxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of CroweNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API