Legal Opinion

Vogel v. U.S. Office Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2001No. 99-1922PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Defendants, U.S. Office Products (“USOP”), Navigant International, Inc. (“Navigant”), Jonathan Ledecky, Thomas Morgan, Donald Platt, and Mark Director, seek review of a magistrate judge’s order remanding a suit filed against them by plaintiffs, Gregory Vogel and Charles Cox, to state court. They contend that remand motions are dispositive motions and, as such, can only be granted by a district court. The district court held that remand motions can be issued by magistrate judges because they are nondispositive and, therefore, that it was precluded from reviewing the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Jeffrey D. Brierly, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc. David EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Laura Flam v. Marshall FlamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Andrew Midlock, Jr. v. Apple Vacations West, Inc., Appeal Of: William J. CremerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Johnson v. WyethDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
  4. Hicks v. Emery Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  5. Rasberry v. Capitol County Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API