Legal Opinion

Farkas v. Fulton, Supt.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1936No. 25235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is not an action for damages against Mariasy, the employee who caused the injury; nor is it a suit seeking to hold Fulton, the Superintendent of Banks, individually liable for the tortious act of his appointee. Whether a personal liability attaches to the superintendent or to his appointee is a question purely academic under this record.

Counsel for the superintendent advance the following legal reasons why the action against the superintendent is not maintainable: (1) That in legal effect the action is one against the state and, being so, the superintendent is not liable in liis official…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Worthington Nursing Home, Inc. v. CreasyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Carey v. Squire, Supt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. National City Bank v. Guardian Trust Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API