Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2008-0279Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PETER ACKERMAN and JOANNE LEEDOM-ACKERMAN, Plaintiffs, Civil Action 08-00279 (HHK) v. Civil Action 08-00722 (HHK) Civil Action 08-01136 (HHK) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Peter Ackerman and Joanne Leedom-Ackerman, husband and wife, bring these actions against the United States of America for refund of (1) income tax (Ackerman I, Civil Action 08-00279); (2) accuracy-related penalties (Ackerman IV, Civil Action 08-01136); and (3) failure-to-pay penalties (Ackerman III, Civil Action 08-00722), all for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Akinseye v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.