Legal Opinion

Korff v. Travelers Ins. of Hartford

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 17, 1936No. Nch 5657PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the problem of the liability of an insurer under a policy insuring against accidental death, where death results from the concurrence of an accident and a diseased condition, neither of which would have been sufficient to cause death but for the concurrence of the other. The court ruled on the question as a matter of law, directing a verdict in favor of the insurer, on the admission that “ * * * the plaintiff does not contend that the accident, the fall alone, under the evidence in the case would have caused the death, if it had not been for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. LloydIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SchlatterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Hume v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Murasky v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LoebCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Vargo v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API