Blank v. Medical Arts Center Hospital
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
Applications for preference in trial under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice have been made by the plaintiffs in these two unrelated causes. In each case the injuries are disabling and permanent. Among other bases for the motions is the advanced age of each of the plaintiffs. In the Hart case plaintiff is 79 years of age. In the Blank case plaintiff is over 85 years of age. Both motions are resisted by the respective defendants, each of whom asserts in substance that old age in and of itself is no basis for preferential advance of trial. This contention appears to be supported by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bernstein v. StrammielloNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Healy v. HealyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- McIntire v. National Nassau BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Rinzler v. Manufacturers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Holdridge v. CalderNew York Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cohen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1963