Rizer v. Gillpatrick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Davis District Court. All the necessary facts in this case are stated in the opinion. Gillpatrick, plaintiff, had judgment at the May Term 1875, and Rizer brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
The facts of this case are briefly as follows: Gillpatrick and Rizer were the administrators of the estate of Samuel S. Caswell deceased, appointed in 1871. Rizer, into whose hands the funds of the estate seem to have passed, deposited them with the banking firm of James Streeter & Co., of which firm he was a member. When the three years for. closing estates had passed, Gillpatrick desired to make a final settlement, draw out the funds from the bank, and pay them over to the heir. Rizer was unwilling. After some delay, Gillpatrick, as one of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shoemaker v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Renner & Bussard v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Smith v. LawrenceNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- McGregor v. . McGregorNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klemp v. WinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Brice v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Feather v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Burks v. American Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Ryan v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.