Legal Opinion
Webb v. Hillsborough County
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 30, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, against defendant in error, as de fendant below, to recover damages for the breach of a contract to construct a public road. The declaration in substance alleges' that on February 27, 1925, Hillsborough County entered into a.written contract with Cone Brothers, a co-partnership composed of J. L. and W. L. Cone, to grade, pave, curb and improve part of a public road in Hills-borough County known as Cypress Street, the said road being outside the limits of a municipality.
It is also alleged that the contract was executed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Buchanan v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Victor Chemical Works v. GaySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. Broward County, and Florida Airmotive Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- PCB PARTNERSHIP v. City of LargoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- County of Brevard v. Interstate Engineering Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Robinson's, Inc. v. ShortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.