Legal Opinion

Bryant Williams v. Gary Swarthout

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 2014No. 11-57255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge MURGUIA

OPINION

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Bryant Keith Williams seeks federal habeas relief on the basis that the state trial court’s misstatement that Williams had pled guilty — a misstatement made immediately before trial commenced and not corrected until the jury began deliberating — violated his due process rights by depriving him of the presumption of innocence, and violated his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. We agree and reverse the district court’s denial of habeas relief.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

At voir dire, on December 7,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryant Williams v. Gary SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Bryant Williams v. Gary SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Williams v. SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API