Bryant Williams v. Gary Swarthout
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge MURGUIA
OPINION
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Bryant Keith Williams seeks federal habeas relief on the basis that the state trial court’s misstatement that Williams had pled guilty — a misstatement made immediately before trial commenced and not corrected until the jury began deliberating — violated his due process rights by depriving him of the presumption of innocence, and violated his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. We agree and reverse the district court’s denial of habeas relief.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
At voir dire, on December 7,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bryant Williams v. Gary SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bryant Williams v. Gary SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Williams v. SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015