Crabtree v. Miller
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON', Chief Justice.
We do not think the petition was subject to respondent’s demurrer. Lambert v. Anderson, 227 Ala. 222, 149 So. 98. Moreover, this point doe's not seem to be insisted upon in brief.
It seems that the judgments were rendered in term time, and within thirty days thereafter the defendant filed motions for a new trial. The court, on June 22, 1933, made an order continuing the motions to the 27th day of June, 1933, for a hearing. On June the 27th, the judge entered upon the motion “continued to August 28, 1933, for hearing at Greensboro, Alabama,” and on August 28, 1933, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte Branch & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Garlick v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Norwood v. L. & N. RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- State ex rel Crow v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Lambert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Ex Parte RegisterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Colquett v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Herbert v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937