Legal Opinion

Public Service Commission v. Village of Freeport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the extent that the billing and collection practices, etc., of Public Service Law article 2 conflict with the more general grant of authority to municipalities to establish their own methods of operation found in General Municipal Law article 14-A, the General Municipal Law provisions are impliedly revoked and the later, more specific, provisions of the Public Service Law control. Although it is preferred that, where possible, both *705statutes be given effect (see, e.g., People v Newman, 32 NY2d 379, 389, cert denied 414 US 1163; Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. [Epps-Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co.], 63…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelley v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Board of Education v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Harvey v. FinnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. IrizarryNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the State of RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API