Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hopkins v. City of Mendenhall

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided January 29, 2013No. 2011-CA-01633-COAPublished

1DissentRoberts, J.

¶ 19. The majority reverses and remands the City of Mendenhall’s decision to adopt Ordinance 244, which closed and vacated a portion of East Court Street in Mendenhall, Mississippi. According to the majority, the record is insufficient to support the City’s decision. With utmost respect for the majority, I find that there is insufficient evidence that Miriam Hopkins, Eldon Sewell, Dina Sewell, Abbie Patrick, Jaris Patrick, Jovita Boggan, Rita Wiggin-ton, or Ann Womack (collectively “Appellants”) have standing to challenge the City’s decision. Accordingly, I dissent.

¶ 20. “Before a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of RidgelandMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Burgess v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Pruitt v. Hancock Medical CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. DeSoto Times Today v. Memphis Publishing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. MILL CREEK PROPERTIES, INC. v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API