Legal Opinion
Cascade General, Petitioner-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 24, 1993No. 91-70547, 91-70605Published
1Opinion of the Court
997 F.2d 571
143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2655, 62 USLW 2064,
125 Lab.Cas. P 10,744
CASCADE GENERAL,* Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Petitioner.
Nos. 91-70547, 91-70605.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 3, 1993.
Decided June 24, 1993.
Wayne D. Landsverk, Newcomb, Sabin, Schwartz & Landsverk, Portland, OR, for petitioner-respondent.
Fred L. Cornell, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent-petitioner.
Petition for Review & Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Before: TANG, POOLE, and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Premium Foods, Incorporated, and v. National Labor Relations Board, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.