Marquis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentGriffin, J.
I respectfully dissent. It is well settled that "work loss” as provided by the no-fault act refers to loss of actual income and not to loss of earning capacity. Ouellette v Kenealy, 424 Mich 83; 378 NW2d 470 (1985). The no-fault act defines work-loss personal protection insurance as follows:
Work loss consisting of loss of income from work an injured person would have performed during the first 3 years after the date of the accident if he had not been injured .... [MCL 500.3107(b); MSA 24.13107(b). Emphasis added.]
In the present case, the majority has confused loss of earning capacity and loss…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacDonald v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Coger v. MacKinaw Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Nawrocki v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Coates v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.