Dyer v. Scott

In the opinion heretofore rendered (Dyer v. Scott, 141 Kan. 463, 470, 41 P. 2d 993) it was stated correctness of the survey of 1932 was not disputed. In a petition for rehearing it is shown an appeal was taken from that survey, and the appeal is pending in the district court. This fact makes it necessary to modify the judgment -of this court with respect to the boundary between tracts I and J, and the judgment is modified to read as follows:

“The judgment with respect to boundary between tracts I and J is reversed. The cause is remanded with direction to render judgment that the true line…