Thomas v. State

GLICKSTEIN, Judge,

concurring with reversal but dissenting as to the directions on remand and as to the concurring opinion.

I concur in the reversal because it was error for the trial court to proceed as it did. However, I disagree with the analysis and per se rule adopted in Hicks v. State, 452 So.2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), for all of the reasons recited in my concurring and dissenting opinion in Hooper v. State, 452 *610So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), which I need not repeat here.

Whatever the Supreme Court of Florida decides, I hope it will resolve the conflicts between the district courts of…