Legal Opinion
Brown v. Marsh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 11, 1989No. Civ. 80-1169 (CRR)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
On May 12, 1988, the Court granted partial summary judgment in the plaintiff Brown’s favor on the issue of liability in this Title VII action. The Court found that the defendant (the “Army”) had failed to respond in a timely fashion to a proposed disposition of Brown’s case prepared by the EEOC. The EEOC’s proposed disposition included a finding that the Army had discriminated against Brown on the basis of his race, which is black. Accordingly, and in compliance with the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding that had been executed between the Army and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Herbert K. Wilson v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- James Brown, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Secretary of the Army, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- James E. Brown v. Secretary of the Army. Wellington Mitchell v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Walker v. DaltonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Lee v. BradyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.