Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J. A. M.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1982No. B-9871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

The question in this paternity suit is the constitutionality of a one-year statute of limitation set out below.

The Court of Civil Appeals sitting at Fort Worth held the statute to be unconstitutional. 605 S.W.2d 332. Other courts of civil appeals had held the statute constitutional. Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Hernandez, 595 S.W.2d 189 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1980, no writ); and Texas Dept. of Human Resources v. Chapman, 570 S.W.2d 46 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.). We granted the writ of error to resolve the conflicts.

After oral argument to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. HabluetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Texas Department of Human Resources v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Texas Department of Human Resources v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. In the Interest of MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perry v. MerritteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. In the Interest of Smith v. Cornelius, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1992
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API