Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1981No. 1636, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

In this case the principal issue we are asked to decide is whether military retirement pay is "marital property” subject to equitable distribution under subtitle 6A of title 3 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland (Cum. Supp. 1980). 1

Mae H. Hill, appellant and cross-appellee, was granted an absolute divorce from Theodore R. Hill, Jr., appellee and cross-appellant, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. In addition she was awarded alimony, counsel fees, and a monetary award pursuant to subtitle 3-6A-05 (b). The husband who served twenty-seven…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Ramsey v. RamseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert C. S. v. Barbara J. S.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Ohm v. OhmCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Brodsky, Greenblatt & Renehan, Chartered v. Daumit (In Re Daumit)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API