Pedraza v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
Ramon Pedraza pled guilty to trafficking in cocaine in excess of 400 grams and carrying a concealed firearm based upon a plea agreement stipulation that he would *1123receive a mandatory minimum five years’ incarceration if he would, by sworn statement as verified by polygraph examination, identify the drug supplier. When he failed the lie detector test and refused to cooperate, he received concurrent sentences of thirty years and five years. . Pedraza contends that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines based upon the facts that he failed to cooperate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Banzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Pursell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Newton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Callaghan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Llorence v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987