Perez v. Oakland County
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKaren Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge
I agree with Judge Cudahy in Part II. A.1 that summary judgment should not be granted on the issue of whether Rice committed a constitutional violation. However, I do not believe that the grant of qualified immunity to Rice is justified in this case, and I therefore respectfully dissent.
We assess claims of qualified immunity according to a three-step test:1
First, we determine whether, based upon the applicable law, the facts viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff ] show that a constitutional violation has occurred. Second, we consider whether the violation involved a clearly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carolyn Comstock v. Norris McCrary v. S. Thyagarajan and David HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Thomas L. Feathers Kathleen Feathers v. William Aey J.P. Donohue, City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Christopher Sample v. Jason BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Danese v. AsmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Perez v. Oakland CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005