Hargett v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
The appellant was convicted of burglary and grand larceny and sentenced to imprisonment for nine years. In seeking a reversal of the judgment he questions the admissibility of his confession.
It is first suggested that the confession should have been excluded because there is no other evidence connecting the accused with the crimes. This is immaterial. An extra-judicial confession is sufficient to support a conviction if there is other proof that the offense was committed by someone. Ark. Stats. 1947, § 43-2115; Faraway v. State, 203 Ark. 912, 159 S. W. 2d 733. Here there was testimony that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haraway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- McCullars v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- State v. KwiatkowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bivens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Wallis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Jamison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.